Per un’estetica dell’attraversamento. Il cinema carrolliano di Terry Gilliam

Authors

  • Stefano Oddi Ricercatore indipendente

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62336/unibg.eac.32.516

Keywords:

Terry Gilliam, Lewis Carroll, Alice, Modern Myth, Adaptation

Abstract

Terry Gilliam’s cinema can be defined as an aesthetic of cross-over, rooted in an osmotic notion of the concept of boundary, meant as an area of communication among different worlds and time frames and, at the same time, a realm in which diverse literary and artistic models merge. The essay first describes this liminal quality of Gilliam’s oeuvre, by outlining the wide range of cultural references lying beneath his aesthetic universe, and then focuses on the prominent role played in it by Alice, the literary icon created by Lewis Carroll, capable of shaping the contents and, more importantly, the very aesthetics of the gilliamesque universe. Indeed, not only is Carroll’s character frequently evoked by the director throughout his films, but the very motifs of constant transformation and refusal of ordinary logic that underpin Alice’s wonderlands seem to function as the structuring essence of the ever-changing worlds devised by Gilliam.

Author Biography

Stefano Oddi, Ricercatore indipendente

After completing his M.A. in Film Studies at Università La Sapienza in Rome, Stefano Oddi worked for several years in film/video production across Italy, Poland and the UK. Between 2017 and 2021, he pursued his Ph.D. in History of the Arts at the Università Ca’ Foscari in Venice, working on contemporary reinterpretations of the Faust myth across film, opera and theatre. He has published essays in several scholarly journals and his research interests include film adaptation, cross-contaminations between film and the other arts, and Italian auteur cinema from 1945 onwards. He lives in Rome, Italy, where he works in the film industry.

 

Published

03-06-2024

How to Cite

Oddi, S. (2024). Per un’estetica dell’attraversamento. Il cinema carrolliano di Terry Gilliam. Elephant & Castle, (32), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.62336/unibg.eac.32.516